by Michael S. Kaplan, published on 2005/07/31 20:39 -04:00, original URI: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2005/07/31/445838.aspx
The other day I complained about how My syndication links are broken.
We can blame it all on surrogates! :-)
You see, when I complained that There is no such thing as a surrogate character (dammit!), the post was sponsored by the first high surrogate, U+d800. And I made the mistake of putting that lone surrogate in quotes as the sponsor.
Community Server was using XML functionality that assumed standards conformant text -- which of course unpaired surrogates are not. So it was choking on the invalid text.
Earlier, when I was saying that blogs.msdn.com was broken, too? Well, my post was in there too - until it scrolled off of the most recent 25. That is also why it came back up so quickly.
The moral of the story? Don't use unpaired surrogate code points. My site was down to RSS aggregators for days!
(the Community Server folks will also try to handle this case a bit more gracefully in future versions, too!)
# Richard on 1 Aug 2005 2:57 AM:
# Chris Hughes on 1 Aug 2005 11:07 AM:
# Maurits [MSFT] on 1 Aug 2005 1:41 PM:
# Michael S. Kaplan on 1 Aug 2005 1:44 PM:
2006/12/05 Validation of Unicode text is growing up
go to newer or older post, or back to index or month or day